Issue library · 5 browsed-site audit checks
Use the pages you visit to find repetition, collisions, and discovery gaps.
A browsed-site review compares captured pages for repeated issues and conflicting signals. It helps triage a site while you navigate, but it is not a complete crawler and cannot prove that an unvisited page is healthy or orphaned.
Page-level fixes can fail at scale when templates repeat metadata, canonicals consolidate the wrong URLs, or important pages have no useful incoming path.
Multiple reviewed URLs use the same page title.
Give distinct pages specific titles that reflect their separate intents.
Revisit the URLs and confirm title groups are unique where they should be.
Multiple reviewed URLs reuse the same description.
Replace boilerplate with page-specific summaries for important indexable pages.
Compare rendered descriptions across the affected URLs.
Multiple reviewed pages present the same primary heading.
Differentiate the H1 when the pages serve different topics or intents.
Review each page title, H1, and opening together.
Several reviewed URLs point to one canonical destination.
Confirm intentional consolidation; otherwise assign the preferred canonical for each distinct page.
Open each URL and compare content equivalence, indexability, and canonical output.
No link from another reviewed page points to the URL.
Add a useful internal path or confirm an unreviewed navigation source already provides one.
Browse the intended source page and confirm the destination appears in the session graph.